Research papers

Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agents

Introduces BrowserART and studies whether chat-model refusal behavior transfers to browser agents carrying out potentially harmful instructions.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Research papers
Environment
web
Topics
safety-security, evaluation
Record publication date
2024-10-11
Evidence retrieved
2026-10-16T06:36:58Z
Resource ID
arxiv:2410.13886

Recorded paper version

arXiv v2

Version updated: 2024-10-21T18:06:58Z.

This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.

Abstract fingerprint4922d9362b23bc0e41d47dacf590c6e9bd6e88cfa6418cf3517814131295270c

Authors

Priyanshu Kumar, Elaine Lau, Saranya Vijayakumar, Tu Trinh, Scale Red Team, Elaine Chang, Vaughn Robinson, Sean Hendryx, Shuyan Zhou, Matt Fredrikson, Summer Yue, Zifan Wang

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

Explore related topics

Safety & securityEvaluation

Scope and limitations

The annotation and scope were reviewed against the primary paper abstract. Experimental results and released artifacts have not been independently reproduced.

Connected assets

These links come from reviewed resource records. A documentation link does not imply a training-data or evaluation dependency.

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. arxiv api

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:58Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.

    Content fingerprintc87e97eb397da04806d53145cf9c13be739fc657bb54dca9318c8c4ed2a36249
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:58Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, relations.

    Content fingerprintc87e97eb397da04806d53145cf9c13be739fc657bb54dca9318c8c4ed2a36249

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.