Research papers

OSWorld-Human: Benchmarking the Efficiency of Computer-Use Agents

OSWorld-Human adds human-determined trajectories to OSWorld to evaluate the efficiency of desktop computer-use agents. The study compares 16 agents and analyzes model-call latency, changes in step duration during task execution, and excess action steps.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Research papers
Environment
desktop
Topics
evaluation, efficiency, observability
Record publication date
2025-06-19
Evidence retrieved
2026-10-16T06:36:50Z
Resource ID
arxiv:2506.16042

Recorded paper version

arXiv v2

Version updated: 2026-05-18T17:55:59Z.

This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.

Abstract fingerprintdf3f654ef1364aeb6cdaeaea1c6334da949a798b2f8256c9ddc4e6a88a588e19

Authors

Reyna Abhyankar, Qi Qi, Yiying Zhang

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

Explore related topics

EvaluationEfficiencyObservability

Scope and limitations

The annotation and scope were reviewed against the primary paper abstract. Experimental results and released artifacts have not been independently reproduced.

Connected assets

These links come from reviewed resource records. A documentation link does not imply a training-data or evaluation dependency.

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. arxiv api

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:50Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.

    Content fingerprint26fb4922c4c0bb5c9069935ed0aef0a9f56938cf8ae1af9724894fa1409955fb
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:50Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, relations.

    Content fingerprint26fb4922c4c0bb5c9069935ed0aef0a9f56938cf8ae1af9724894fa1409955fb

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.