A Systematization of Security Vulnerabilities in Computer Use Agents
Analyzes security boundaries in computer-use agents through a risk taxonomy and concrete adversarial case studies. It links observed failures to input provenance, interface-action binding, memory, and delegation, and proposes CUA-specific evaluation principles.
AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.
What is this resource?
- Resource type
- Research papers
- Environment
- web
- Topics
- safety-security, evaluation
- Record publication date
- 2025-07-07
- Evidence retrieved
- 2026-10-16T06:36:50Z
- Resource ID
- arxiv:2507.05445
Recorded paper version
Version updated: 2025-07-07T19:50:21Z.
This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.
Abstract fingerprint
3ad2f299303076e3474cf247cf25d20ba63b1f1aa8601ab74243c00896bb56e4Authors
Daniel Jones, Giorgio Severi, Martin Pouliot, Gary Lopez, Joris de Gruyter, Santiago Zanella-Beguelin, Justin Song, Blake Bullwinkel, Pamela Cortez, Amanda Minnich
Cite this paper
Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON
Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.
Explore related topics
Scope and limitations
Reviewed against the complete retained original arXiv abstract. Experimental results and artifact availability have not been independently reproduced. This is a threat analysis with case studies; the annotation does not imply a standardized public benchmark or independently validated defenses.
Primary evidence and verification
Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.
- arxiv api
Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:50Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.
Content fingerprint
26fb4922c4c0bb5c9069935ed0aef0a9f56938cf8ae1af9724894fa1409955fb - editorial primary review
Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:50Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, notes.
Content fingerprint
26fb4922c4c0bb5c9069935ed0aef0a9f56938cf8ae1af9724894fa1409955fb
Suggest a correction
Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.