Research papers

LegacyWorld: Atomicity-Aware Evaluation of GUI Agents for Legacy Workflows

LegacyWorld evaluates Windows GUI workflows under an atomicity criterion: finish correctly or fail without persistent unintended changes. It compares expert prompts with prompts derived from recorded golden paths and separates useful completion, safe failure and non-atomic side effects.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Research papers
Environment
desktop, windows
Topics
evaluation, safety-security, workflow, recording
Record publication date
2026-08-14
Evidence retrieved
2026-10-16T06:36:32Z
Resource ID
arxiv:2608.14131

Recorded paper version

arXiv v1

Version updated: 2026-08-14T09:36:33Z.

This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.

Abstract fingerprintf8a6bd69d421bdfb9a21c22e715a59d0afb0b0cab75510f28ff569903ecffae5

Authors

Thilo Reintjes, Sivajeet Chand, Derui Zhu, Sushant Kumar Pandey, Alexander Pretschner

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

Explore related topics

EvaluationSafety & securityWorkflowsRecording

Scope and limitations

The annotation and scope were reviewed against the complete retained original arXiv abstract. Experiments, reported performance and artifact availability have not been independently reproduced.

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. arxiv api

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:32Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.

    Content fingerprint13d3fb5811d203f2e6b80eb45d30ebc0b3cfefd88e2034ffa3b1b80687bef285
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:36:32Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, notes.

    Content fingerprint13d3fb5811d203f2e6b80eb45d30ebc0b3cfefd88e2034ffa3b1b80687bef285

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.