Research papers

ORBIT: A Framework for Multi-Agent Safety and Security Evaluations

Inspect-based framework that varies multi-agent roles, communication, attacks and defenses, with BrowserGym and virtual-desktop GUI adapters alongside coding and other tool scenarios.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Research papers
Environment
web, desktop
Topics
evaluation, safety-security, web-navigation
Record publication date
2026-09-27
Evidence retrieved
2026-10-20T13:12:28.833839+00:00
Resource ID
arxiv:2609.33102

Recorded paper version

arXiv v1

Version updated: 2026-09-27T02:20:08Z.

This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.

Abstract fingerprint3c380079220050fbe354509238a5a79c7df2917a245490e4ec0cff512f7565ab

Authors

Ben Hagag, William L. Anderson, Srija Chakraborty, Christian Schroeder de Witt

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

Explore related topics

EvaluationSafety & securityWeb navigation

Scope and limitations

BrowserART uses an accessibility-tree action interface, while the desktop adapter uses mouse, keyboard and screenshots. The adapted tasks are not claimed to preserve the constructs of their source benchmarks. Experiments cover a representative configuration slice with fixed attack templates; the OS-Harm results are imported from prior work using a different model and stack. Browser defense tables also differ in baseline versus defended judges and in judged benign denominators. Human judge validation used one grader. These results do not establish a universally effective defense. The linked repository and its code/data licenses were not independently inspected, and no experiment was run.

Connected assets

These links come from reviewed resource records. A documentation link does not imply a training-data or evaluation dependency.

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. arxiv api

    Retrieved 2026-10-20T12:58:20.217517Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.

    Content fingerprintf275c47a8b6d349a70e39a9e55eea5a09d99d5f35cc896100f3bcfd5b0923e0b
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-20T13:12:28.833839+00:00. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, notes.

    Content fingerprint3ea667f4187ba601011e5ff00c4d63676b6d9903d12b80a0d7d5dd9920f00c65

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.