Reading Right, Acting Wrong: Diagnosing Decision Failures of System One Models in Agent Loops

Pairs factual probes with next-action choices on frozen agent traces, including Mind2Web, to diagnose reading-decision gaps without closed-loop execution.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

What is this resource?

Resource type

Research papers

Environment

web

Topics

evaluation, web-navigation, interaction-history

Record publication date

2026-10-13

Evidence retrieved

2026-10-20T15:08:55Z

Resource ID

arxiv:2610.18579

Recorded paper version

arXiv v1

Version updated: 2026-10-13T15:43:30Z.

This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.

Authors

Yubo Li, Ramayya Krishnan, Rema Padman

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

What licenses are recorded?

Code, training data, weights, and documents can have different terms. A blank declaration means unknown, not unrestricted use.

Code

Not recorded

Data

Not recorded

Document

CC-BY-4.0 (The retained version-specific arXiv HTML infobox explicitly labels this paper License: CC BY 4.0. This document declaration does not establish code, training-data or model-weight licenses.)

Weights

Not recorded

License review notes

• Document: The retained version-specific arXiv HTML infobox explicitly labels this paper License: CC BY 4.0. This document declaration does not establish code, training-data or model-weight licenses. Source 1

Explore related topics

Scope and limitations

Adjacent diagnostic research across simulators, policies, tools, coding and an offline Mind2Web subset. Models choose among supplied admissible actions; they do not generate actions or execute a closed-loop browser policy in the reported evaluation. The paired probes measure selected visible facts, not complete understanding or internal causation. Pooled results are not a web-only leaderboard, and the paper reports coverage limits and label-sensitivity analyses. No benchmark release, code, data or weights were independently inspected.

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

1. arxiv api

   Retrieved 2026-10-20T15:06:37Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.

   Content fingerprint

   a3d753815e82190ee2de6f322cd816c32f2dd391f862845305fc7e57300303a6
2. editorial primary review

   Retrieved 2026-10-20T15:08:55Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, notes, licenses.document.

   Content fingerprint

   bcbc640d1e732ba0415a9755bce120a811a13a2ba7fba3e58a167b3a9111c2a6

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.