WebLINX

Demonstrations and evaluation for conversational web navigation.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

What is this resource?

Resource type

Benchmarks

Environment

web

Topics

evaluation, web-navigation

Record publication date

Not recorded

Evidence retrieved

2026-10-16T06:35:57Z

Resource ID

github:mcgill-nlp/weblinx

What licenses are recorded?

Code, training data, weights, and documents can have different terms. A blank declaration means unknown, not unrestricted use.

Code

Apache-2.0 (repository LICENSE header; not a weights/data license)

Data

Not recorded

Document

Not recorded

Weights

Not recorded

Evaluation protocol

Focus

conversational web navigation, next-action prediction

Setting

offline

Observations

dialogue history, HTML, screenshots, action history

Actions / outputs

predicted browser actions

Evaluation

Offline evaluation compares action predictions against recorded human demonstrations.

Scale and counting units

• ≈ 100,000 interactions — original paper benchmark source
• ≈ 2,300 expert demonstrations — original paper benchmark source
• > 150 websites — original paper benchmark source

The figures are rounded descriptions from the original paper. WebLINX 1.1 / BrowserGym removes some demonstrations and changes evaluated steps, including tab actions; do not mix those results or counts with the original release. This profile does not treat replayed demonstration steps as live task completion.

Compare source-reviewed profiles

Explore related topics

Related resources

• documented by: WebLINX: Real-World Website Navigation with Multi-Turn Dialogue

Connected assets

These links come from reviewed resource records. A documentation link does not imply a training-data or evaluation dependency.

• trained on: Llama-3-8B-Web · Models and checkpoints · relationship evidence

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

1. editorial primary review

   Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:35:57Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, relations, details.

   Content fingerprint

   15c3f1656afd861894b180bca7d9214b4cf78a6ad9cd0601c80f5d67d2839528
2. editorial primary review

   Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:35:57Z. Supports: details.benchmark_protocol.

   Content fingerprint

   15c3f1656afd861894b180bca7d9214b4cf78a6ad9cd0601c80f5d67d2839528
3. editorial primary review

   Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:31:24Z. Supports: details.benchmark_protocol.

   Content fingerprint

   3aac6e9748769efff3c475ede0da192776daa03431d231b5f67e2aa50f8a3be9
4. editorial primary review

   Retrieved 2026-10-17T02:03:23Z. Supports: details.benchmark_protocol.

   Content fingerprint

   9bd7512e257f5914d66b091530d7eb711a6f90bc21dc89cbba53015c7136c527
5. license header

   Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:41:57Z. Supports: licenses.code.

   Content fingerprint

   cc0156153933fb96f6f3bf8d736c15e24d78d0838945c2ed456e3ada96cf67c4

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.