Benchmarks

WebRewardBench

An offline preference-evaluation set for web process reward models, pairing page and trajectory context with preferred and rejected candidate decisions.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Benchmarks
Environment
web
Topics
web-navigation, reward-models, evaluation
Record publication date
Not recorded
Evidence retrieved
2026-10-17T02:44:50Z
Resource ID
url:ac6d0f80765f5a32255a

What licenses are recorded?

Code, training data, weights, and documents can have different terms. A blank declaration means unknown, not unrestricted use.

Code
Not recorded
Data
Not recorded
Document
Not recorded
Weights
Not recorded

Evaluation protocol

Focus
web process-reward evaluation
Setting
offline
Observations
page screenshots, text observations, action history, task checklists
Actions / outputs
candidate-decision preference
Evaluation
Compare reward-model preferences with the provided chosen/rejected decision labels; no independent score was reproduced.

Scale and counting units

The current Hub row count and project case-count claim use unresolved counting units. Candidate lists mean a row must not be assumed to equal one task or one pair.

Compare source-reviewed profiles

Recorded specifications

disabled
false
download url
https://huggingface.co/datasets/LangAGI-Lab/WebRewardBench/tree/main
gated
false
hub id
LangAGI-Lab/WebRewardBench

Explore related topics

Web navigationReward modelsEvaluation

Scope and limitations

Two public Parquet shards are present. Card metadata reports 776 test rows, whereas the project describes 1,000-plus test cases without reconciling that count to rows. Both observations are retained as a grain/coverage caveat rather than treating either as a confirmed number of independent tasks. No data license is declared.

Related resources

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-17T02:44:50Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, relations, details.

    Content fingerprint0968f60eea10b95f79cd16ad3746b0e0b1acaeb0e97c45856f709d53a14dd73a
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-17T02:44:50Z. Supports: identity, release_status, details, licenses.data.

    Content fingerprintdb06c66b8cf5687008b0ad0d9ae269fcc27936887d238cfe2bdeb52151e1683e
  3. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-17T02:44:04Z. Supports: summary, environments.

    Content fingerprint07431058d8b9a71b80e75b7a74a40a8346c1503eec240628459cc4d4e2f0802f

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.