Benchmarks

CUAVerifierBench

Human-annotated browser-agent trajectories for comparing automated task-success and process-quality verifiers against reviewer judgments.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Benchmarks
Environment
web
Topics
evaluation, reward-models, web-navigation
Record publication date
Not recorded
Evidence retrieved
2026-10-17T02:42:32Z
Resource ID
url:d5140d438466c1e1348a

What licenses are recorded?

Code, training data, weights, and documents can have different terms. A blank declaration means unknown, not unrestricted use.

Code
Not recorded
Data
mit (publisher model/dataset card metadata; third-party assets retain their own terms)
Document
Not recorded
Weights
Not recorded

License review notes

Evaluation protocol

Focus
verifier-human agreement, process quality
Setting
offline
Observations
screenshots, action logs, final answers
Actions / outputs
success verdict, process score
Evaluation
Agreement metrics including Cohen’s kappa, accuracy and F1 against human annotations; review stages must be kept distinct.

Scale and counting units

Trajectory rows and reviewer rows have different grains. Internal task labels do not make the released Parquet files private. No payload data was downloaded.

Compare source-reviewed profiles

Recorded specifications

disabled
false
download url
https://huggingface.co/datasets/microsoft/CUAVerifierBench/tree/main
gated
false
hub id
microsoft/CUAVerifierBench

Explore related topics

EvaluationReward modelsWeb navigation

Scope and limitations

Public Parquet configs separate trajectories from per-reviewer annotations. The card declares MIT. The two splits have different review stages: Online-Mind2Web includes blind and verifier-informed annotations, whereas the internal split is blind-only. This measures verifier agreement rather than agent task success.

Related resources

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-17T02:42:32Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, relations, details, licenses.data.

    Content fingerprint44d7190b72ae489297f59d6fadff635ced6dd067c845c77b04f187a7b2d7bec7
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-17T02:42:32Z. Supports: identity, release_status, details, licenses.data.

    Content fingerprintfb1fe8a9fd6e45fc82157c65c08d5c682d08bead5196308776200ef3c39c1e41

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.