Benchmarks

Precision CUA Bench

Evaluation resources for pixel-precise cursor grounding in code editors.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as MarkdownRecord JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type
Benchmarks
Environment
cross-platform
Topics
evaluation, grounding
Record publication date
Not recorded
Evidence retrieved
2026-10-16T06:40:52Z
Resource ID
github:microsoft/precision-cua-bench

What licenses are recorded?

Code, training data, weights, and documents can have different terms. A blank declaration means unknown, not unrestricted use.

Code
MIT (repository LICENSE header; not a weights/data license)
Data
Not recorded
Document
Not recorded
Weights
Not recorded

Evaluation protocol

Focus
pixel-precise editor cursor placement, multi-turn visual self-correction
Setting
offline
Observations
code-editor screenshot, cursor-location instruction, red-cross feedback marking previous incorrect prediction
Actions / outputs
pixel (x,y) cursor coordinate
Evaluation
The inspected evaluator scales target boxes from a 1000×1000 reference grid into image pixels and tests pixel predictions, allowing ±10 pixels around the center along any target dimension narrower than 1 pixel after scaling. It reports cumulative hit accuracy by turn (earlier hits remain correct), miss distances, any-turn hit rate, and a correction rate whose denominator is all successfully processed samples. The default budget is five turns; retain prompt/feedback variant, turn budget, and processed/skipped coverage.

Scale and counting units

Not recorded

The release has four editor/theme JSONL partitions (Cursor/VS Code × dark/light) and screenshot files. Partitions are not train/test splits or independent task totals. README’s initial field table calls bbox pixel coordinates, but the evaluation-format section and actual ratio_h/ratio_w=dimension/1000 code use normalized target boxes; profile follows the inspected evaluator and retains the inconsistency. Source/images were not executed or downloaded as a dataset. MIT is recorded for repository code only.

Compare source-reviewed profiles

Explore related topics

EvaluationGUI grounding

Related resources

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

  1. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:40:52Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, relations.

    Content fingerprint23d0dc8ea0a10c080cf8ae32121eade2785ae923a6b0d853d166c94c195e789b
  2. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:35:59Z. Supports: details.benchmark_protocol.

    Content fingerprint84ad4fb798abb776dce813cf4dab296d6e03248d8ae29388e1f06cccd27d1241
  3. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-17T14:21:08Z. Supports: details.benchmark_protocol.

    Content fingerprint1fda7c3980fe7a7c373478eda6ecfabff227e92c2b1f19c6fe903b408f583797
  4. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-17T14:14:06Z. Supports: details.benchmark_protocol.

    Content fingerprintede84e3dda47f80fada4234caa2423db08e21ff7667a37599c03aae657b2f84b
  5. editorial primary review

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:32:00Z. Supports: relations.

    Content fingerprint4d09ebfb093e43a4c44adef86c8fa8374f90d907fc33bd8e12a1315e62d5a583
  6. license header

    Retrieved 2026-10-16T06:41:59Z. Supports: licenses.code.

    Content fingerprintc2cfccb812fe482101a8f04597dfc5a9991a6b2748266c47ac91b6a5aae15383

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.