Research papers

GUI Testing Using Computer Vision

Presents visual GUI test scripts that use images to specify actions and expected screen feedback. Recording both input events and screenshots can generate tests from demonstrations, supporting unit, regression, and test-driven workflows.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

Original source ↗Read as Markdown Record JSON

What is this resource?

Resource type: Research papers
Environment: unspecified
Topics: evaluation, grounding, automation
Record publication date: 2010-04
Evidence retrieved: 2026-10-17T09:53:21Z
Resource ID: url:6262c757080f8838e62c

Authors

Tsung-Hsiang Chang, Tom Yeh, Robert C. Miller

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

Publication record

Title: GUI Testing Using Computer Vision
Authors: Tsung-Hsiang Chang, Tom Yeh, Robert C. Miller
Publication date (recorded precision): 2010-04
Venue: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10)
Pages: 1535-1544
DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753555

Publication source ↗

Publication BibTeX · Publication CSL JSON

Date source: Supplied month precision: 2010-04. Date Issued: April 2010

Source notes: Distinct visual-testing contribution from the 2009 Sikuli paper. The institutional abstract and published-version citation supply the retained evidence. Exact publication day and operating-system coverage are not established in the accessible institutional abstract.

Explore related topics

Evaluation GUI grounding Automation

Scope and limitations

The annotation was reviewed against retained primary publication sources. Experiments have not been independently reproduced. This is a separate visual-testing contribution from the 2009 Sikuli paper, not another version of the same article. MIT PDF download returned HTTP 429; its complete institutional abstract and citation metadata remain the retained review source.

Connected assets

These links come from reviewed resource records. A documentation link does not imply a training-data or evaluation dependency.

Documented resource: Sikuli legacy research implementation · Tools · relationship evidence

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

editorial primary review
Retrieved 2026-10-17T09:53:21Z. Supports: details.publication.authors, details.publication.date_basis, details.publication.date_parts, details.publication.doi, details.publication.identity_basis, details.publication.notes, details.publication.pages, details.publication.title, details.publication.type, details.publication.url, details.publication.venue.
Content fingerprint
dbace77c54d1b4ed5dcf825dcb0f4525c32e33ac885e70312e8bb4a731a94e80
editorial primary review
Retrieved 2026-10-17T09:53:21Z. Supports: details.publication.authors, details.publication.date_basis, details.publication.date_parts, details.publication.doi, details.publication.identity_basis, details.publication.notes, details.publication.pages, details.publication.title, details.publication.type, details.publication.url, details.publication.venue, environments, kind, name, scope, summary, topics.
Content fingerprint
dbace77c54d1b4ed5dcf825dcb0f4525c32e33ac885e70312e8bb4a731a94e80

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.