Evaluation

Source-reviewed research and assets tagged with Evaluation.

Membership follows reviewed tags; it does not establish a dependency between neighboring records. Dates preserve source precision. Annotations retain their original language.

Papers & surveys

592Back to top ↑
Paper

Domain-Conditioned Safety in Frontier Computer-Using Agents: A 793-Episode Browser Benchmark, a Coding-Domain Cross-Reference, and a Reproducibility Audit of Recent Red-Teaming

Nicholas Saban

Introduces CUA-HandCrafted, a browser-agent red-teaming benchmark that varies attack templates, tasks and system prompts. Its domain comparison and reproducibility audit caution against transferring browser-surface safety conclusions to coding agents or unreleased optimized injections.

Web
Paper

GUI Agents for Continual Game Generation

Yixu Huang, Bo Li et al.

PlaytestArena evaluates generated browser games using expected in-play behaviors adjudicated by GUI agents. Play2Code pairs a coding agent with a rubric-blind GUI playtester whose interaction traces and feedback guide iterative refinement, with a separate final judge.

WebAdjacent research
Paper

How Mobile World Model Guides GUI Agents?

Weikai Xu, Kun Huang et al.

Compares mobile world models that predict state changes as delta text, full text, images or renderable code. Downstream Android benchmarks examine synthetic training trajectories and test-time guidance, including limits of post-action reflection.

Android
Paper

On the Reliability of Computer Use Agents

Gonzalo Gonzalez-Pumariega, Saaket Agashe et al.

This study examines repeated OSWorld executions to separate execution stochasticity, task-specification ambiguity and behavioral variation. Paired task-level tests show why one successful run is insufficient evidence of reliable computer use.

Desktop

Showing 181–240 of 720 resources.

Get full records and evidence through the topic export manifest. Source records can be passed to the standard RAG and citation exporters after cloning the catalog.