How To Train Your World Model: Fine-tuning vs RAG for LM-based World Modeling

Compares fine-tuned, retrieval-based and hybrid language-model world models for next-observation prediction and action selection in text environments including WebShop.

AI-assisted editorial review against a primary source. This is a catalog annotation, not an independent reproduction or endorsement.

What is this resource?

Resource type

Research papers

Environment

web

Topics

world-models, planning, evaluation, web-navigation

Record publication date

2026-10-01

Evidence retrieved

2026-10-20T15:08:56Z

Resource ID

arxiv:2610.02542

Recorded paper version

arXiv v1

Version updated: 2026-10-01T22:30:08Z.

This identifies the retained arXiv metadata snapshot; newly observed changes require separate review.

Authors

Dhananjay Ashok, Shantanu Agarwal, Vivek Datla, Jonathan May, Alfy Samuel

Cite this paper

Download BibTeX · Download CSL JSON

Citations preserve the selected source edition, its authors and recorded date precision. Unrecorded venues and identifiers are omitted.

What licenses are recorded?

Code, training data, weights, and documents can have different terms. A blank declaration means unknown, not unrestricted use.

Code

Not recorded

Data

Not recorded

Document

CC-BY-4.0 (The retained version-specific arXiv HTML infobox explicitly labels this paper License: CC BY 4.0. This document declaration does not establish code, training-data or model-weight licenses.)

Weights

Not recorded

License review notes

• Document: The retained version-specific arXiv HTML infobox explicitly labels this paper License: CC BY 4.0. This document declaration does not establish code, training-data or model-weight licenses. Source 1

Explore related topics

Scope and limitations

Adjacent cross-domain study with WebShop as its web evaluation. WebShop uses text-rendered search/product pages and an explicit valid-action menu, not screenshot control or live purchases. A frozen policy proposes five actions; a world model predicts their next observations and the policy scores them before one is executed in the simulator. Utility is normalized environment reward, while fidelity uses a model judge; neither is a universal GUI task-success rate. Fine-tuning and retrieval use collected training experience; the hybrid masks same-episode retrieval, which does not establish general contamination freedom. The retained Atom and v1 HTML abstract wording differs; original bibliographic metadata and its abstract digest are preserved.

Primary evidence and verification

Source retrieval is separate from experiment reproduction. Use the original publication or publisher page when citing claims about the resource.

1. arxiv api

   Retrieved 2026-10-20T15:06:37Z. Supports: name, authors, published_at, updated_at, identifiers.arxiv, details.arxiv_snapshot.

   Content fingerprint

   a3d753815e82190ee2de6f322cd816c32f2dd391f862845305fc7e57300303a6
2. editorial primary review

   Retrieved 2026-10-20T15:08:56Z. Supports: name, kind, summary, environments, topics, scope, notes, licenses.document.

   Content fingerprint

   d8c22c6b3f07d4156c38af9dd7ca7c06a5d0a11889a7350d821a020e21604590

Suggest a correction

Open a source-backed correction. Include this record ID and the original source. Read our editorial policy and coverage boundaries.