RESEARCH LIBRARY

Computer-use research library

中文

Source-backed papers on GUI grounding, agents, training, evaluation, and safety.

Read the research survey ↗ · Methods, evaluation, and human agency — an English working manuscript with a source-by-source reading register.

AI-assisted editorial review of primary sources; experiments are not independently reproduced. Dates keep their recorded precision. Resource links below follow reviewed introduction or documentation relationships. Method ↗

2026

564 papers & surveysBack to years ↑
arXiv v1

Are Android GUI Agents Robust Against Runtime Anomalies? AnTrap: Evaluating Agents in Dynamic Adversarial Environments

Guo Gan, Yilun Zhao + 6 authors

Introduces AnTrap, which injects task-solvable runtime anomalies into Android GUI-agent trajectories using a layered failure taxonomy. It compares model robustness and adversarial reinforcement learning to distinguish recoverable interface traps from persistent contextual failures.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

WebMCP-Phalanx: Enforcing and Characterizing Trust Boundaries for Browser-Integrated LLM Agents

Lin-Fa Lee, YI-YU Chang + 1 author

Proposes WebMCP-Phalanx, a browser-integrated runtime that binds page-exposed tools to their registering principals and separates content inspection from privileged invocation. It studies lifecycle and prompt-injection attacks, including a timing bypass that motivates validating all visible metadata before tool use.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

LegacyWorld: Atomicity-Aware Evaluation of GUI Agents for Legacy Workflows

Thilo Reintjes, Sivajeet Chand + 3 authors

LegacyWorld evaluates Windows GUI workflows under an atomicity criterion: finish correctly or fail without persistent unintended changes. It compares expert prompts with prompts derived from recorded golden paths and separates useful completion, safe failure and non-atomic side effects.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

DSAgentBench: Can Agents Automate End-to-End Data-Science Workflows in Real Computer Environments?

Mizanur Rahman, Mohammed Saidul Islam + 4 authors

DSAgentBench evaluates end-to-end data-science workflows spanning analysis, modeling and visualization inside a real desktop environment. Task evaluators check produced analytical and visual artifacts, while the released interface supports screenshot or accessibility observations and GUI actions.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

"Allow" to Achieve, Over-Privileged Inadvertently: The Unintended Cost of Task-Completion-Driven Pop-up Decisions in Mobile GUI Agents

Dongsheng Chen, Yuxuan Li + 6 authors

This permission-literacy study tests whether mobile GUI agents grant only task-necessary permissions. Controlled changes to task context and requester identity expose authorization biases and the trade-off between suppressing unnecessary and legitimate grants.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

MAGA: Multi-Platform Self-Fusion of GUI Agents via Structured Action Distillation

Hang Yan, Zhangxuan GU + 6 authors

MAGA distills specialized GUI agents into one policy by allocating supervision according to structured-action correctness rather than treating all response tokens equally. A training-only teacher hint supports fusion across mobile, web and desktop settings without changing student inputs.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

Rethinking Inference-Time Scaling in Local Computer-Use Agents: Failure Modes and Compute Tradeoffs

Woongkyu Lee, Jungwook Choi

Examines inference-time scaling for local computer-use models by varying context, step budgets, decomposition, and parallel execution. OSWorld experiments track both task performance and changing failure modes, exposing cases where extra computation extends errors or adds coordination overhead.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

Why Are GUI Agents Correct but Late? Decode on the Decision-Time Critical Path, Tested with Pre-Compiled Policy Trees

Zihan Dong, Rui Qian + 4 authors

Introduces Adaptive Anticipatory Policy Trees, which precompute guarded actions and deadlines during idle periods so transient GUI events can be handled without new text generation. Paired experiments examine when this prepared execution helps and when reactive control remains preferable.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v1

Echoverse: Deep, Evolving Environments for Training Computer-Use Agents at Scale

Yash Pandya, Sahil Gupta + 11 authors

Introduces Echoverse, which compiles specifications into stateful applications with database-grounded graders and uses rollouts to improve both the environments and agent policies. It examines behavioral depth, targeted interface practice, and environment repair as sources of training value.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →
arXiv v2

Interactive Reward Agent: GUI Task Evaluation via Environment-State Verification

Chenrui Shi, Yuwei Wu + 6 authors

Introduces an Interactive Reward Agent that proposes completion conditions and verifies them using system, application, and GUI tools after execution. GUI-RewardBench provides annotated desktop trajectories for evaluating these evidence-based judgments and their use in reinforcement learning.

Paper ↗BibTeX ↓Details →

Showing 181–240 of 1,200, newest first.